[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180210031925.GA1041@zzz.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 19:19:25 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+bacbe5d8791f30c9cee5@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in get_user_pages_unlocked
Hi Al,
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 01:36:40AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:57:27AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> > syzbot tests for up to 5 minutes. However, if there is a race involved
> > then you may need more time because the crash is probabilistic.
> > But from what I see most of the time, if one can't reproduce it
> > easily, it's usually due to some differences in setup that just don't
> > allow the crash to happen at all.
> > FWIW syzbot re-runs each reproducer on a freshly booted dedicated VM
> > and what it provided is the kernel output it got during run of the
> > provided program. So we have reasonably high assurance that this
> > reproducer worked in at least one setup.
>
> Could you guys check if the following fixes the reproducer?
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 61015793f952..058a9a8e4e2e 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,9 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct task_struct *tsk,
> BUG_ON(*locked != 1);
> }
>
> + if (flags & FOLL_NOWAIT)
> + locked = NULL;
> +
> if (pages)
> flags |= FOLL_GET;
>
Yes that fixes the reproducer for me.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists