linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] Documentation for Pmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180210033714.GA12711@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Feb 2018 19:37:14 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, jglisse@...hat.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org, labbott@...hat.com,
        hch@...radead.org, cl@...ux.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Documentation for Pmalloc

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:56:29PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> But what is the license for the documentation? It's not code, so GPL
> seems wrong. Creative commons?

I've done this as the first line of my new documentation files:

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0

I think this is the CC license that's closest in spirit to the GPL without
the unintended consequences of the GPL when used on documentation.  The
GFDL seems to be out of favour these days.