linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/23] 4.15.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180210072253.GB8814@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:22:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/23] 4.15.3-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:40:41PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.3 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Feb 11 13:39:20 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.3-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> Since the last RC, we have upgraded LTP from release version 20170929 to
> release version 20180118. The fanotify06 (and "runltp_syscalls")
> regressions listed below are due to a problem in LTP itself (see
> http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2018-January/006915.html). We will
> either carry a patch to fix fanotify06, or skip it until the next LTP
> release. You'll see this noise in the other branches as well.

Ah, nice you upgraded LTP, lots of fixes are getting merged into there
lately.

And thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h