linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 46/92] x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:23:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 46/92] x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:01:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> >
> > (cherry picked from commit 0e6c16c652cadaffd25a6bb326ec10da5bcec6b4)
> >
> > After commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> > pointers are being hashed when printed. However, this makes the alternative
> > debug output completely useless. Switch to %px in order to see the
> > unadorned kernel pointers.
> 
> This missed a "Fixes:" tag so probably missed automated checking on
> how far back to port this. It shouldn't go back beyond 4.15 (where
> ad67b74d2469 first appeared).

Good point.  Should we instead be using %pK for this change instead?  Or
should we just backport commit ad67b74d2469 to 4.14?  :)

Thanks for letting me know this.

greg k-h