lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wozi7pwy.fsf@xmission.com>
Date:   Sun, 11 Feb 2018 23:11:41 -0600
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mingo@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <uobergfe@...hat.com>, <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86/apic: Fix restoring boot irq mode in reboot and kexec/kdump

Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> One thing confused me.
>
> The disconnect_bsp_APIC() may restore the interrupt delivery mode into
> virtual wire mode. it uses the vector F as the spurious interrput, But,
> IMO, using the vector 0xFF(SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR) may more suitable and
> will give us more detail. Why the disconnect_bsp_APIC() use vector F
> here?

I would say this needs a documentation search before changing this.

This code originates in:
208fb93162d5 ("[PATCH] kexec: x86_64: restore apic virtual wire mode on shutdown")

The example in the Multi-Processor Specification v1.4 shows setting
up the SPIV to vector 0x0f.

I don't know what is canonical and what will interact best with DOS,
and that erra of setup.  The vector 0x0f seems an odd choice as
it is below 0x20 putting it in the range of vectors that are
reserved for processor exceptions.

The constant SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR is definitely not something we want
to be using at this point as that is a linux specific setting and used
when Linux is up and running.  So it is completely inapplicable.

This is all about restoring how the apics were configured at boot time
so it may be appropriate to copy and store this value, if it was not
architectural.

At a practical level at this point I suspect we are ok as the setting
of the SPIV this way has not caused any known problems in the last
decade.   If someone wants to dig through the archtectural documents
and the real world practice and find a better value and explain the
change I would not oppose it.

All I know for certain is using the constant SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR
is completely inappropriate (as that constant is about how linux uses
vectors) and thus the patch below is wrong.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index 25ddf02598d2..550deaad6a9a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
>         value = apic_read(APIC_SPIV);
>         value &= ~APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
>         value |= APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED;
> -       value |= 0xf;
> +       value |= SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR;
>         apic_write(APIC_SPIV, value);
>
>         if (!virt_wire_setup) {
>

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ