linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86/apic: Fix restoring boot irq mode in reboot and kexec/kdump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3bff2f47-ae3e-58e0-420a-378ff3f55b65@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:58:33 +0800
From:   Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mingo@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <uobergfe@...hat.com>, <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86/apic: Fix restoring boot irq mode in reboot
 and kexec/kdump

Hi Eric,

At 02/12/2018 01:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> One thing confused me.
>>
>> The disconnect_bsp_APIC() may restore the interrupt delivery mode into
>> virtual wire mode. it uses the vector F as the spurious interrput, But,
>> IMO, using the vector 0xFF(SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR) may more suitable and
>> will give us more detail. Why the disconnect_bsp_APIC() use vector F
>> here?
> 
> I would say this needs a documentation search before changing this.
> 
> This code originates in:
> 208fb93162d5 ("[PATCH] kexec: x86_64: restore apic virtual wire mode on shutdown")
> 
> The example in the Multi-Processor Specification v1.4 shows setting
> up the SPIV to vector 0x0f.
> 
Thanks for your detailed explanation, I found the example A-1 in this
spec.

> I don't know what is canonical and what will interact best with DOS,
> and that erra of setup.  The vector 0x0f seems an odd choice as
> it is below 0x20 putting it in the range of vectors that are
> reserved for processor exceptions.
> 
> The constant SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR is definitely not something we want
> to be using at this point as that is a linux specific setting and used
> when Linux is up and running.  So it is completely inapplicable.
> 
> This is all about restoring how the apics were configured at boot time
> so it may be appropriate to copy and store this value, if it was not
> architectural.
> 
> At a practical level at this point I suspect we are ok as the setting
> of the SPIV this way has not caused any known problems in the last
> decade.   If someone wants to dig through the archtectural documents
> and the real world practice and find a better value and explain the
> change I would not oppose it.

Indeed, I understand.


Thanks,
	dou

> 
> All I know for certain is using the constant SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR
> is completely inappropriate (as that constant is about how linux uses
> vectors) and thus the patch below is wrong.
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
>> index 25ddf02598d2..550deaad6a9a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
>> @@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
>>          value = apic_read(APIC_SPIV);
>>          value &= ~APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
>>          value |= APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED;
>> -       value |= 0xf;
>> +       value |= SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR;
>>          apic_write(APIC_SPIV, value);
>>
>>          if (!virt_wire_setup) {
>>
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
>