lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:34:37 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/mm: Stop printing the virtual memory layout

Hi Finn,

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:48 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Since commit ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with
>> %p"), the virtual memory layout printed during boot up contains "ptrval"
>> instead of actual addresses:
>>
>>     Memory: 268040K/276480K available (2979K kernel code, 310K rwdata, 784K rodata, 144K init, 172K bss, 8440K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
>>     Virtual kernel memory layout:
>>       vector  : 0x003d2e74 - 0x003d3274   (   1 KiB)
>>       kmap    : 0xd0000000 - 0xf0000000   ( 512 MiB)
>>       vmalloc : 0x11800000 - 0xd0000000   (3048 MiB)
>>       lowmem  : 0x00000000 - 0x11000000   ( 272 MiB)
>>         .init : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval)   ( 144 KiB)
>>         .text : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval)   (2980 KiB)
>>         .data : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval)   (1095 KiB)
>>         .bss  : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval)   ( 173 KiB)
>>
>> Instead of changing the printing to "%px", and leaking virtual memory
>> layout information again,
>>
>> just remove the printing completely, cfr. e.g.
>> commit 071929dbdd865f77 ("arm64: Stop printing the virtual memory
>> layout").
>>
>> All interesting information (actual section sizes) is already printed by
>> mem_init_print_info() just above anyway.
>
> Or maybe revert to %lx with pr_debug instead of pr_notice. Just a thought;

(%px prints unhashed pointers, no need for %lx and cast)

> I don't have any preference.

Dynamic debug is hot these days, so that may be enabled by distros,
still leaking the info.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ