[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9098c6c8-83e5-5e1f-519b-68e14738c24a@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:46:31 -0600
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs_bmc: mark expected switch fall-through in
kcs_bmc_handle_data
On 02/14/2018 11:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
Thanks, queued for next release.
-corey
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465255 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> This code was compiled with GCC 7.3.0
>
> drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
> index 3a3498a..6476bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void kcs_bmc_handle_data(struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc)
> switch (kcs_bmc->phase) {
> case KCS_PHASE_WRITE_START:
> kcs_bmc->phase = KCS_PHASE_WRITE_DATA;
> + /* fall through */
>
> case KCS_PHASE_WRITE_DATA:
> if (kcs_bmc->data_in_idx < KCS_MSG_BUFSIZ) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists