linux-kernel - Re: Linux & FAT32 label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180214215233.tbcoieywczdwvy37@pali>
Date:   Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:52:33 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:     Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andreas Bombe <aeb@...ian.org>, util-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrius Štikonas <andrius@...konas.eu>,
        Curtis Gedak <gedakc@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote:
> > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=)
> > 
> > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including LABEL_FATBOOT:
> > https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/compare/master...pali:master
> 
> Seems good. I'll wait for official pull request. Thanks!
> 
> > I have not created official pull request on github yet as Andreas have
> > not decided yet about dosfstools/fatlabel...
> 
> OK.

Looks like that Andreas is not responding to mailing list, nor to
private emails, nor on github for 3-4 months ... I hope he is OK.

But I do not know what happened with dosfstools project now in this
case, if it is going to be fixed or not.

I have prepared more patches for dosfstools project, but do not know if
I should open new pull requests or wait (how long?) or do something
else.

If it helps for somebody, I can create fork of dosfstools project and
include there all changes which I have prepared.

Any opinion? What other people think about this situation right now?

Karel, do you want to create official pull request for above util-linux
changes, even without fixes in dosfstools project?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)