[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f673f072-86f3-ed72-e715-bed883551be4@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:30:33 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Delete an unnecessary return
statement in two functions
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:14:32 +0100
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index 460bf22a8a2b..782a8c2a359d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -122,14 +122,12 @@ static int query_current_values_with_pending_wait(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
static void count_off_irt(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
{
udelay((1 << data->irt) * 10);
- return;
}
/* the voltage stabilization time */
static void count_off_vst(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
{
udelay(data->vstable * VST_UNITS_20US);
- return;
}
/* need to init the control msr to a safe value (for each cpu) */
--
2.16.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists