lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180215193614.28684-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:36:14 +0000
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][V2] rtc: tx4939: avoid unintended sign extension on a 24 bit shift

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

The shifting of buf[5] by 24 bits to the left will be promoted to
a 32 bit signed int and then sign-extended to an unsigned long. If
the top bit of buf[5] is set then all then all the upper bits sec
end up as also being set because of the sign-extension. Fix this by
casting buf[5] to an unsigned long before the shift.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1465292 ("Unintended sign extension")

Fixes: 0e1492330cd2 ("rtc: add rtc-tx4939 driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c
index feededce3ded..1f351308afdc 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ static int tx4939_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 	for (i = 2; i < 6; i++)
 		buf[i] = __raw_readl(&rtcreg->dat);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pdata->lock);
-	sec = (buf[5] << 24) | (buf[4] << 16) | (buf[3] << 8) | buf[2];
+	sec = ((unsigned long)buf[5] << 24) | (buf[4] << 16) |
+		(buf[3] << 8) | buf[2];
 	rtc_time_to_tm(sec, tm);
 	return rtc_valid_tm(tm);
 }
@@ -170,7 +171,8 @@ static int tx4939_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	alrm->enabled = (ctl & TX4939_RTCCTL_ALME) ? 1 : 0;
 	alrm->pending = (ctl & TX4939_RTCCTL_ALMD) ? 1 : 0;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pdata->lock);
-	sec = (buf[5] << 24) | (buf[4] << 16) | (buf[3] << 8) | buf[2];
+	sec = ((unsigned long)buf[5] << 24) | (buf[4] << 16) |
+		(buf[3] << 8) | buf[2];
 	rtc_time_to_tm(sec, &alrm->time);
 	return rtc_valid_tm(&alrm->time);
 }
-- 
2.15.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ