linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sata_dwc_460ex: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in sata_dwc_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:22:56 -0800
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_dwc_460ex: Delete an error message for a failed
 memory allocation in sata_dwc_port_start()

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:39:13AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:15:25 +0100
> > 
> > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this
> > function.
> > 
> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Tejun, it's up to you. In case you are fine with the change,

Yeah, these are marginal at best and one may be able to argue that
emitting a message with device identifier is still useful but these
allocations are order-zero and can't fail to begin with, so...

Thanks.

-- 
tejun