[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518971510.1894.2.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:31:50 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i40evf: remove redundant array comparisons to 0 checks
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 16:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Colin Ian King
> <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> > On 16/02/18 16:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> > > > + filter->f.mask.tcp_spec.dst_ip[i] |=
> > > > cpu_to_be32(0xffffffff);
> > >
> > > Can it be one line then?
> >
> > I re-adjusted the text because checkpatch was complaining.
> > >
> > > > + filter->f.mask.tcp_spec.src_ip[i] |=
> > > > cpu_to_be32(0xffffffff);
>
> For the rest OK, but for the above two how much over 80 it went if
> would be one line?
> If it 2-3 characters, consider to make it one line. It would increase
> readability.
Another possibility would be to use temporaries for
filter->f.mask.tcp_spec
and
filter->f.data.tcp_spec
as both are used ~10 times in the function
Powered by blists - more mailing lists