[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5A8AF2AA02000078001A91E9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:52:10 -0700
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/LDT: avoid warning in 32-bit builds with older gcc
BUG() doesn't always imply "no return", and hence should be followed by
a return statement even if that's obviously (to a human) unreachable.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- 4.16-rc2/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ 4.16-rc2-ix86-ldt_slot_va-retval/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static inline void *ldt_slot_va(int slot
return (void *)(LDT_BASE_ADDR + LDT_SLOT_STRIDE * slot);
#else
BUG();
+ return (void *)fix_to_virt(FIX_HOLE);
#endif
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists