[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <669340a4-e748-07f4-51d5-bf0566cd75b8@jonmasters.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:13:38 -0500
From: Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>
To: "Wang, Dongsheng" <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Yang, Shunyong" <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zheng, Joey" <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>,
"Jiang, Yutang2" <yutang2.jiang@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI / tables: Add IORT to injectable table list
On 02/02/2018 07:12 AM, Wang, Dongsheng wrote:
> Hey, Hanjun,
>
> On 2018/2/2 19:54:24, "Hanjun Guo" <guohanjun@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2018/2/2 18:25, Yang Shunyong wrote:
>>> Loading IORT table from initrd is used to fix firmware IORT defects.
>>
>> I don't think this fix "firmware defects", it just for debug purpose,
>> we will not use that for production purpose, right? I think above line
>> can be removed.
>>
> I thinks the upgrade feature not only for debug. Here's an important
> way to fix bugs that come from the firmware.
>
> Documentation/acpi/initrd_table_override.txt
I think we should message that this is for debug/development use.
Ultimately, it's not the way to address firmware problems. Firmware
needs to address that by shipping the correct(ed) tables :)
--
Computer Architect
Powered by blists - more mailing lists