linux-kernel - Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180222180420.GA17956@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:04:20 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
        "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
        Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        "open list:METAG ARCHITECTURE" <linux-metag@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:14:11AM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > I'd love to see dead architecture ports dropped if they really are
> > more or less abandoned.  In addition to your missing gcc port ones
> > above (minus openrisc) it seems like frv and m32r certainly qualify,
> > and xtensa seems to be going that way with the glibc port being dropped
> > now.
> 
> It's not that it's been dropped, there have never been an official glibc
> port for xtensa, but we're working to get one.

Ah sorry - I meant to say tile not xtensa when writing this.