linux-kernel - [PATCH][ACPI-next] ACPI: battery: make function __battery_hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180223163255.3899-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:32:55 +0000
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     "Rafael J . Wysock" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][ACPI-next] ACPI: battery: make function __battery_hook_unregister static

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

The function __battery_hook_unregister is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
drivers/acpi/battery.c:654:6: warning: symbol '__battery_hook_unregister'
was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index cfdef4c1d097..b4580b2e8706 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_battery_list);
 static LIST_HEAD(battery_hook_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(hook_mutex);
 
-void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
+static void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
 {
 	struct acpi_battery *battery;
 	/*
-- 
2.15.1