[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1655597.UWgU0oY7TV@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:44:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ACPI-next] ACPI: battery: make function __battery_hook_unregister static
On Friday, February 23, 2018 5:32:55 PM CET Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The function __battery_hook_unregister is local to the source and does
> not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> drivers/acpi/battery.c:654:6: warning: symbol '__battery_hook_unregister'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index cfdef4c1d097..b4580b2e8706 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_battery_list);
> static LIST_HEAD(battery_hook_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(hook_mutex);
>
> -void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
> +static void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
> {
> struct acpi_battery *battery;
> /*
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists