linux-kernel - Re: `do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector` on ASRock E350M1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180226163102.GM4377@pd.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:31:02 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-irq@...gen.mpg.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: Re: `do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector` on ASRock E350M1

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:14:10AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 2:59 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >> Am 23.02.2018 um 20:09 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:18:34PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>>> Borislav is seeing similar issues on larger AMD machines. The interrupt
> >>>> seems to come from BIOS/microcode during bringup of secondary CPUs and we
> >>>> have no idea why.
> >>>
> >>> Paul, can you boot 4.14 and grep your dmesg for something like:
> >>>
> >>> [    0.000000] spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. >
> >>> ?
> >>
> >> No, I do not see that. Please find the logs attached.
> > 
> > From your 4.14 log:
> > 
> > Feb 19 09:48:06.843173 kodi kernel: CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=e9b0a000 soft=e9b0c000
> > Feb 19 09:48:06.843216 kodi kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.
> 
> I think I remember seeing something like this previously and it turned out
> to be a BIOS bug.  All the AP's were enabled to work with the legacy 8259
> interrupt controller.  In an SMP system, only one processor in the system
> should be configured to handle legacy 8259 interrupts (ExtINT delivery
> mode - see Intel's SDM, Volume 3, section 10.5.1, Delivery Mode).  Once
> the BIOS was fixed, the spurious interrupt message went away.
> 
> I believe at some point during UEFI, the APs were exposed to an ExtINT
> interrupt.  Since they were configured to handle ExtINT delivery mode and
> interrupts were not yet enabled, the interrupt was left pending.  When the
> APs were started by the OS and interrupts were enabled, the interrupt
> triggered. Since the original pending interrupt was handled by the BSP,
> there was no longer an interrupt actually pending, so the 8259 responds
> with IRQ 7 when queried by the OS.  This occurred for each AP.

Interesting - is this something that can happen on Zen too?

Because I have such reports too.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.