[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180226191054.14025-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:10:53 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] make start_isolate_page_range() thread safe
This patch was included in the RFC series "Interface for higher order
contiguous allocations".
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180212222056.9735-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Since there have been few comments on the RFC and this patch addresses
a real issue with the current code, I am sending it separately.
To verify this is a real issue, I created a large CMA area at boot time.
I wrote some code to exercise large allocations and frees via cma_alloc()
and cma_release(). At the same time, I had a script just allocate and
free gigantic pages via the sysfs interface.
After a little bit of running, 'free memory' on the system went to
zero. After 'stopping' the tests, I observed that most zone normal
page blocks were marked as MIGRATE_ISOLATE. Hence 'not available'.
I suspect there are few (if any) systems employing both CMA and
dynamic gigantic huge page allocation. However, it is probably a
good idea to fix this issue. Because this is so unlikely, I am not
sure if this should got to stable releases as well.
Mike Kravetz (1):
mm: make start_isolate_page_range() fail if already isolated
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++----
mm/page_isolation.c | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists