lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519708355.3120.9.camel@wdc.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 05:12:36 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To:     "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: use blk_mq_requeue_request in
 __scsi_queue_insert

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:00 +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> On the other hand, this patch is to align the actions between blk-mq and block
> legacy code in __scsi_queue_insert.

Hello Jianchao,

Since the legacy SCSI core unpreps an reprepares a request when requeuing it I
think your patch does not align the blk-mq and legacy block layer actions but
instead makes the behavior of the two code paths different.

Thanks,

Bart.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ