[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478f40f1-d86c-ee5f-daaf-6332b67fe721@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:15:10 +0800
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: use blk_mq_requeue_request in
__scsi_queue_insert
Hi Bart
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 02/27/2018 01:12 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:00 +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>> On the other hand, this patch is to align the actions between blk-mq and block
>> legacy code in __scsi_queue_insert.
>
> Hello Jianchao,
>
> Since the legacy SCSI core unpreps an reprepares a request when requeuing it I
> think your patch does not align the blk-mq and legacy block layer actions but
> instead makes the behavior of the two code paths different.
>
Can you share more details about this ?
Thanks
Jianchao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists