[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a85a7cf-c59c-f338-2087-c9de799adbe8@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:18:30 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse doesn't support indirect_branch attribute
On 02/27/2018 11:48 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> Don't use __attribute__((indirect_branch)) if we're compiling with
> sparse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> index e2c7f4369eff..b6be4cc25e9d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> #define __weak __attribute__((weak))
> #define __alias(symbol) __attribute__((alias(#symbol)))
>
> -#ifdef RETPOLINE
> +#if defined(RETPOLINE) && !defined(__CHECKER__)
> #define __noretpoline __attribute__((indirect_branch("keep")))
> #endif
>
>
I don't mind the patch, but I did send a patch for this attribute on Feb. 13, 2018,
to the sparse mailing list.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists