[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8202ea69-f0ed-db10-a0d3-9fd470c1c441@deltatee.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:26:57 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI/P2PDMA: Clear ACS P2P flags for all devices
behind switches
On 01/03/18 02:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> This is still a pretty terrible solution though, your kernel provider
> needs to decide whether they favor device assignment or p2p, because we
> can't do both, unless there's a patch I haven't seen yet that allows
> boot time rather than compile time configuration. There are absolutely
> supported device assignment cases of switches proving isolation between
> devices allowing the downstream EPs to be used independently. I think
> this is a non-starter for distribution support without boot time or
> dynamic configuration. I could imagine dynamic configuration through
> sysfs that might trigger a soft remove and rescan of the affected
> devices in order to rebuild the IOMMU group. The hard part might be
> determining which points to allow that to guarantee correctness. For
> instance, upstream switch ports don't actually support ACS, but they'd
> otherwise be an obvious concentration point to trigger a
> reconfiguration. Thanks,
At this point, I don't expect this to be enabled in any distribution.
The use case is for custom hardware intended to do P2P which means they
can have a custom kernel with P2P enabled. The default for
CONFIG_PCI_P2P is 'no' and I expect it to stay that way for a long time.
Another boot option which has to be set for this to work isn't something
we'd like to see.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists