linux-kernel - Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b4d0708-c375-02b0-9014-9400992addf8@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:42:15 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Progyan Bhattacharya <bprogyan@...il.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

On 02/28/2018 11:50 PM, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 20:07 +0530, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote:
>> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:47 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> You could try (re)building with V=1 on the "make" command line and
>>> capture
>>> the output to see where the "pedantic" is coming from.
>>
>> This is a late reply.
>> I did what you told me and the build failed at following point:
>>
>> 	/bin/sh: /home/progyan/Programs/Linux/tools/objtool/.objtool-
>> in.o.cmd: Permission denied
>>
>> I am not sure what permission it wants or what to make of it.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.

Is that a question?

I don't get or see that message.

What distro are you using? Maybe it adds some build options?

If you would build with V=1 and capture all of the output (lots of it!) to a file,
you could search it for "pedantic" to see where/why it is used.

I have no idea about the permission problem that you quoted above.

-- 
~Randy