linux-kernel - Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1520342938.6596.1.camel@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:58:58 +0530
From:   Progyan Bhattacharya <bprogyan@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Progyan Bhattacharya <bprogyan@...il.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 13:42 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> If you would build with V=1 and capture all of the output (lots of
> it!) to a file,
> you could search it for "pedantic" to see where/why it is used.
> 
> I have no idea about the permission problem that you quoted above.

Sorry for the misunderstanding!
Here is the full build log for

    make V=1

-- 
Regards,
Progyan Bhattacharya
(http://codeprogyan.me)
View attachment "make_log.txt" of type "text/plain" (18512 bytes)