[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180302225455.GD31240@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 23:54:55 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] mm, dax: replace IS_DAX() with IS_DEVDAX() or
IS_FSDAX()
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:54:22PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> static inline bool vma_is_dax(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - return vma->vm_file && IS_DAX(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host);
> + struct inode *inode;
> +
> + if (!vma->vm_file)
> + return false;
> + inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
> + return IS_FSDAX(inode) || IS_DEVDAX(inode);
If you look at the definition of IS_FSDAX and IS_DEVDAX this
is going to evaluate into some bullshit code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists