linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: expose the host's ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ccead1df-ba70-f365-c816-7892834a290c@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:36:23 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: expose the host's ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR to
 userspace

On 01/03/2018 22:39, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> [Resent after removing g@...r.us.oracle.com.]
> 
> 2018-02-26 17:13-0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk:
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 01:52:26AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Use the new MSR feature framework to expose the ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR to
>>> userspace.  This way, userspace can access the capabilities even if it
>>> does not have the permissions to read MSRs.
>>
>> ... That is good but could you expand a bit of why it would want this?
>>
>> I am 99% sure it is due to the lovely spectre_v2 mitigation but
>> could you include that in the commit message so that in say a year
>> folks would know what this is?
> 
> Userspace can currently get the MSR by creating a VCPU and reading its
> MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, because it is set from the hardware MSR.
> 
> I thought that "permissions to read MSRs" talked about hardware MSRs, so
> the purpose of this patch would be a better interface, but I don't see
> how if we keep the auto-setting on VCPU creation.

Yeah, it's mostly about a better interface and being able to do checks
before creating the VCPU.  The commit message was written before I
noticed the auto-setting on VCPU creation, and I failed to update it.

Thanks,

Paolo

> Is this aimed towards userspaces that want nothing else from KVM than
> the MSR value?
> 
> Thanks.
>