linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: Properly handle interrupts of number 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180302140901.lrjqiaa2k4nxkqco@mwanda>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:09:01 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: Properly handle interrupts of number 0

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:58:54PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > It needs platform maintainers to be motivated to fix it, and one way to
> > provide that motivation is for subsystem maintainers to say no to patches
> > like this.  If patches like this get accepted, then the "problem" gets
> > solved, and there is very little motivation to fix the platform itself.
> 
> Yes, I can see this. I will drop / revert the patch.
> 

TBH, I can't find the threads from November so I feel a bit lost and
there is no documentation for platform_get_irq().

regards,
dan carpenter