linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/6] IR support for A83T

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180302141001.2eqbpahdl7sddtzk@gofer.mess.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 14:10:01 +0000
From:   Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To:     Philipp Rossak <embed3d@...il.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        wens@...e.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        andi.shyti@...sung.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/6] IR support for A83T

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:11:34PM +0100, Philipp Rossak wrote:
> On 13.02.2018 13:29, Philipp Rossak wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for the sunxi A83T ir module and enhances
> > the sunxi-ir driver. Right now the base clock frequency for the ir driver
> > is a hard coded define and is set to 8 MHz.
> > This works for the most common ir receivers. On the Sinovoip Bananapi M3
> > the ir receiver needs, a 3 MHz base clock frequency to work without
> > problems with this driver.
> > 
> > This patch series adds support for an optinal property that makes it able
> > to override the default base clock frequency and enables the ir interface
> > on the a83t and the Bananapi M3.
> > 
> > changes since v4:
> > * rename cir pin from cir_pins to r_cir_pin
> > * drop unit-adress from r_cir_pin
> > * add a83t compatible to the cir node
> > * move muxing options to dtsi
> > * rename cir label and reorder it in the bananpim3.dts file
> > 
> > changes since v3:
> > * collecting all acks & reviewd by
> > * fixed typos
> > 
> > changes since v2:
> > * reorder cir pin (alphabetical)
> > * fix typo in documentation
> > 
> > changes since v1:
> > * fix typos, reword Documentation
> > * initialize 'b_clk_freq' to 'SUNXI_IR_BASE_CLK' & remove if statement
> > * change dev_info() to dev_dbg()
> > * change naming to cir* in dts/dtsi
> > * Added acked Ackedi-by to related patch
> > * use whole memory block instead of registers needed + fix for h3/h5
> > 
> > changes since rfc:
> > * The property is now optinal. If the property is not available in
> >    the dtb the driver uses the default base clock frequency.
> > * the driver prints out the the selected base clock frequency.
> > * changed devicetree property from base-clk-frequency to clock-frequency
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Philipp
> > 
> > Philipp Rossak (6):
> >    media: rc: update sunxi-ir driver to get base clock frequency from
> >      devicetree
> >    media: dt: bindings: Update binding documentation for sunxi IR
> >      controller
> >    arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: Add the cir pin for the A83T
> >    arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: Add support for the cir interface
> >    arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: bananapi-m3: Enable IR controller
> >    arm: dts: sun8i: h3-h5: ir register size should be the whole memory
> >      block
> > 
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt |  3 +++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-bananapi-m3.dts         |  5 +++++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi                   |  2 +-
> >   drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c                         | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >   5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> I talked yesterday with Maxime about this patch series. And he told me if
> the first to patches got merged, he will apply the dts patches to the sunxi
> tree.
> 
> Sean, can you merge the first two patches through the rc-core?

Sure, no problem.

Thanks
Sean