linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] mmc: dw_mmc: remove the deprecated "clock-freq-min-max" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180302152104.gnylb6xtgy5hb7i5@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:21:04 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>, dinguyen@...nel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mmc: dw_mmc: remove the deprecated
 "clock-freq-min-max" property

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:16:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> > On 2018/2/23 21:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 'clock-freq-min-max' property had already deprecated.
> >>> Remove the 'clock-freq-min-max' property that is kept to maintain
> >>> the compatibility.
> >>
> >>
> >> Removing a property without telling the user what to expect is a bad
> >> idea and ABI breakage.
> >>
> >
> > What's the general process to remove a property?
> >
> > I guess we should do:
> > 1) deprecate it in the first place and remove it from all upstream DT

Yes

> > 2) wait some long enough days for expecting the stale of all old DTB
> > containing that property

Yes. How long that is depends on the platform. I think the minimum is 1 
release cycle. Some stable platforms are years. If there are other DT 
changes with new features everyone should want/need, then that can be a 
decision point.

Given this is a shared IP block it's harder to know, so you may need to 
err on the longer side.

> > 3) remove the functionality of the deprecated property from the driver
> > but still leave some warning there

I'd say add a warning in step 1 and combine 3 and 4.

> > 4) remove the left warning finally
> 
> I don't know. Perhaps Rob can shed a light here.
> But I would really OK with removal of some of such properties from
> some drivers where it's more burden to keep them.
> 
> > And for the ABI breakage, we should add something in Documentation/ABI
> > /obsolete  or Documentation/ABI/removed ?

It is only an ABI break if someone notices.

Rob