[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1803021017150.1408-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:17:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2 RFC] tools/memory-model: redefine rb in terms of
rcu-fence
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:31:41PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:37:58AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:49:06AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > And as Andrea pointed out off-list, I did indeed mess up Boqun's change.
> > > I forgot to change the "irreflexive" into "acyclic". Applying that change
> > > makes everything work.
> > >
> > > Please accept my apologies for my confusion!
> > >
> >
> > np, also I should have provided a proper patch for your testing.
> >
> > For this Alan's patch, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
>
> Alan's last submission was still RFC, so I have not yet queued it.
> So this ball is still in Alan's court.
I'll wait a few more days to see if there are any other comments and
then submit it officially.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists