[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180302173808.GR3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:38:08 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2 RFC] tools/memory-model: redefine rb in terms of
 rcu-fence
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 10:17:55AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:31:41PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:37:58AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:49:06AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 
> > [ . . . ]
> > 
> > > > And as Andrea pointed out off-list, I did indeed mess up Boqun's change.
> > > > I forgot to change the "irreflexive" into "acyclic".  Applying that change
> > > > makes everything work.
> > > > 
> > > > Please accept my apologies for my confusion!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > np, also I should have provided a proper patch for your testing.
> > > 
> > > For this Alan's patch, feel free to add:
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> > 
> > Alan's last submission was still RFC, so I have not yet queued it.
> > So this ball is still in Alan's court.
> 
> I'll wait a few more days to see if there are any other comments and 
> then submit it officially.
Will do!
							Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
