[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <774c1251-46d9-534e-24c2-ca04f1e0a8bb@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:09:23 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 16/22] x86/mm: Preserve KeyID on pte_modify() and
pgprot_modify()
On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> + * It includes full range of PFN bits regardless if they were claimed for KeyID
> + * or not: we want to preserve KeyID on pte_modify() and pgprot_modify().
> */
> -#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_PFN_MASK | _PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT | \
> +#define PTE_PFN_MASK_MAX \
> + (((signed long)PAGE_MASK) & ((1UL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1))
> +#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_PFN_MASK_MAX | _PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT | \
> _PAGE_SPECIAL | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY | \
> _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY)
Is there a way to make this:
#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PTE_PFN_MASK | PTE_KEY_MASK...? | _PAGE_PCD |
That would be a lot more understandable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists