linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH 13/22] mm, rmap: Free encrypted pages once mapcount drops to zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb2cc1cf-1be1-4535-f71b-fa33272a6f71@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:12:15 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 13/22] mm, rmap: Free encrypted pages once mapcount
 drops to zero

On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>  extern void prep_encrypt_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order);
> +extern void free_encrypt_page(struct page *page, int keyid, unsigned int order);

The grammar here is weird, I think.

Why not free_encrypted_page()?