[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180306102638.25322-1-vbendel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:26:38 +0100
From: Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@...hat.com>
To: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: Correctly invert xfs_buftarg LRU isolation logic
Due to an inverted logic mistake in xfs_buftarg_isolate()
the xfs_buffers with zero b_lru_ref will take another trip
around LRU, while isolating buffers with non-zero b_lru_ref.
Additionally those isolated buffers end up right back on the LRU
once they are released, because b_lru_ref remains elevated.
Fix that circuitous route by leaving them on the LRU
as originally intended.
Signed-off-by: Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index d1da2ee9e6db..ac669a10c62f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate(
* zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the
* buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU.
*/
- if (!atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
+ if (atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock);
return LRU_ROTATE;
}
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists