lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180306180319.GC2080@avx2>
Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:03:19 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + mm-relax-ptrace-mode-in-process_vm_readv2.patch added to -mm
 tree

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:42:19PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:02:08PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:07 PM,  <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > > It is more natural to check for read-from-memory permissions in case of
> > > process_vm_readv() as PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH is equivalent to write
> > > permissions.
> > 
> > NAK, this weakens the existing permission model for reading
> 
> What if existing permission model is overezealous?
> 
> /proc/*/auxv, /proc/*/environ, /proc*/cmdline, /proc/*/mem opened
> for reading and process_vm_readv(2) should do PTRACE_MODE_READ and
> everything else should do PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH.

Or in other words:

what if there should be 3 levels:
1) permission to write to address space
2) permission to read arbitrarily from adress space
3) permission to read auxv, argv and envp

Current code conflates (1) and (2).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ