linux-kernel - Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180306213350.GH13586@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:33:50 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:06:48PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Yeah, that's what I expected.  What we really need to figure out I think
> > is what exactly is taking the lock that we end up colliding with, I
> > don't seem to be able to reproduce so I'm having to just go on staring
> > at the code here.

> Any debug options I should turn on in order to help us to understand
> more on the lock issue?

No, unfortunately, apart from the generic kernel ones (like lockdep).
I'll try to have a poke at adding some tomorrow, though I'm also
considering just dropping the series for now.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)