linux-kernel - Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 19:10:01 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> No, unfortunately, apart from the generic kernel ones (like lockdep).
> I'll try to have a poke at adding some tomorrow, though I'm also
> considering just dropping the series for now.

Ok, lockdep is already enabled by default in the defconfig I am using
(imx_v6_v7_defconfig).

Yesterday I spent a few hours trying to understand this locking issue,
but didn't get any success on this task.

Thanks