[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1520525762.4638.13.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:16:02 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>,
'Frederic Weisbecker' <fweisbec@...il.com>,
'Paul McKenney' <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
'Thomas Ilsche' <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
'Aubrey Li' <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
'Mike Galbraith' <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Linux PM' <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/6] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 07:18 -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2018.03.07 17:29 Doug wrote:
> > On 2018.03.07 14:12 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.ne
> > > t> wrote:
> > > > On 2018.03.06 12:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > During the test I got some messages (I also got some with the
> > > > V1 patch set):
> > > Can you please check if that's reporoducible with just the first
> > > three
> > > patches in the series applied?
> >
> > I will.
>
> No issues. Test duration: 7 hours and 26 minutes.
> Boot seems normal. Times re-booted 4.
I am observing the same issues here.
I'll comb through the code to see if I can
spot the issue :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists