[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gyppPoobcA_Q3FDnGAXnJeamkXo=Rgdg2495nfizpZcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:36:00 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/6] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 07:18 -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2018.03.07 17:29 Doug wrote:
>> > On 2018.03.07 14:12 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.ne
>> > > t> wrote:
>> > > > On 2018.03.06 12:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > > During the test I got some messages (I also got some with the
>> > > > V1 patch set):
>> > > Can you please check if that's reporoducible with just the first
>> > > three
>> > > patches in the series applied?
>> >
>> > I will.
>>
>> No issues. Test duration: 7 hours and 26 minutes.
>> Boot seems normal. Times re-booted 4.
>
> I am observing the same issues here.
>
> I'll comb through the code to see if I can
> spot the issue :)
I found a problem that may be causing this.
You can very well wait for a respin of the series, should be tomorrow. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists