[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5cf960c5-73ab-fd53-fb68-b6f7f92ca3e7@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:50:20 +0100
From: Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism
On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote:
>
>> I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch
>> series on their boards.
>
> That'd be great, yeah - I can run some tests with kernelci as well,
> though the latency is relatively high there.
>
> Is it possible to respin this in terms of the test/coupled branch in my
> git tree? There were a bunch of build fixes that got sent and I don't
> want to loose any of those.
>
I have included those build fixes in my new patchset. I can extract the newest
changes and rebase them against your test/coupled branch, if that's what you're
asking for.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists