[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152061989141.26240.15533446439693285034@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:24:51 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
JOLLYS@...inx.com, michals@...inx.com,
Rajan Vaja <rajanv@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-fixed-factor: Use new macro CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER
Quoting Rajan Vaja (2018-03-08 06:15:00)
> Fixed factor clock has two initialization at of_clk_init()
> time and also during platform driver probe. So declare the
> fixed factor clock with CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER instead of
> CLK_OF_DECLARE.
>
> See below commit for reference:
> "clk: sunxi: apb0: Use new macro CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER"
> (sha1: 915128b621a05c63fa58ca9e4cbdf394bbe592f3)
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajanv@...inx.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> index a5d402d..d72ef2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> @@ -196,8 +196,9 @@ void __init of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> {
> _of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(node);
> }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clock",
> - of_fixed_factor_clk_setup);
> +
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clock",
> + of_fixed_factor_clk_setup);
>
Is the intent to register the clk twice? I believe things are working as
intended without this patch, so maybe you can explain a little more what
you're trying to fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists