[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312072413.toyd5ztkgaah35xg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:24:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, andi <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc4 1/2] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
>
> checkpatch.pl still reports:
>
> total: 15 errors, 3 warnings, 165 lines checked
>
> > +notrace static u64 vread_tsc_raw(void)
> > +{
> > + u64 tsc, last=gtod->raw_cycle_last;
> > + if( likely( gtod->has_rdtscp ) )
> > + tsc = rdtscp((void*)0);
>
> Plus I asked more than once to split that rdtscp() stuff into a separate
> patch.
>
> You surely are free to ignore my review comments, but rest assured that I'm
> free to ignore the crap you insist to send me as well.
In addition to Thomas's review feedback I'd strongly urge the careful reading of
Documentation/SubmittingPatches as well:
- When sending multiple patches please use git-send-mail
- Please don't send several patch iterations per day!
- Code quality of the submitted patches is atrocious, please run them through
scripts/checkpatch.pl (and make sure they pass) to at least enable the reading
of them.
- ... plus dozens of other details described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists