lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312093557.gxypr66vrbftz3v3@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:35:57 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, yasu.isimatu@...il.com,
        indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] x86/KASLR: Add parameter
 kaslr_boot_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]


* Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Long time no reply, rebase the patchset, change the parameter name
> from 'kaslr_mem' to 'kaslr_boot_mem'. There's no more code change.
> 
> ***Background:
> People reported that kaslr may randomly chooses some positions
> which are located in movable memory regions. This will break memory
> hotplug feature.

[...]

> ***Solutions:
> Introduce a new kernel parameter 'kaslr_boot_mem=nn@ss' to let users to
> specify the memory regions where kernel can be allowed to randomize
> safely.

Manual solutions like that are pretty suboptimal to users, aren't they?

In what way does memory hotplug feature 'break'? Does it crash or misbehave? Or 
simply does it not allow the movement of the affected memory region, while still 
allowing the rest to be moved?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ