linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the battery tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANEr7oWy2ATCnExdoFkCt9Sz3OUEgEQpQQiqmKnOh7iVDekiKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:46:08 +0100
From:   "Pierre Bourdon (delroth)" <delroth@...gle.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andre Heider <a.heider@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the battery tree

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Pierre Bourdon (delroth)
<delroth@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 at 02:40, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> Commit
>>
>>   5e0dfcbb1194 ("max17042: propagate of_node to power supply device")
>>
>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>
> I failed hard :) will resend.

So, since I'm very clearly not familiar with the process... is sending
a v2 with proper s-o-b the Right Way to do it, or are you just fine
with a correction by email?

If the latter:

Signed-off-by: Pierre Bourdon <delroth@...gle.com>

Sorry for the screwup, slowly learning (I hope).
Best,

-- 
Pierre Bourdon (delroth@)