[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFaeLdSSqDok6_jaa4wwxuo+71qkv7ha5Rs81B7LvEAsRZDfYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:26:07 +0800
From: 李書帆 <leechu729@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
shufan_lee(李書帆) <shufan_lee@...htek.com>,
cy_huang(黃啟原) <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Jun Li <jun.li@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: modify parameter of tcpci_irq")
Hi Greg,
2018-03-12 19:07 GMT+08:00 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:46:42PM +0800, ShuFan Lee wrote:
>> From: ShuFan Lee <shufan_lee@...htek.com>
>
> Your subject is odd, that line should be below, in the signed-off-by:
> area, not as the subject of the patch :(
>
> Can you fix this up and resend?
Yes.
If I understand correctly, the title should be like
staging: typec: modify parameter of tcpci_irq
and the "Fixes" tag should be put in the signed-off-by area.
Should it be in the beginning of the area:
Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: handle vendor defined part and
modify drp toggling flow")
Signed-off-by: xxx
or the end of the area?
Signed-off-by: xxx
Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: handle vendor defined part and
modify drp toggling flow")
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
Best Regards,
書帆
Powered by blists - more mailing lists