[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312114358.GA1910@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:43:58 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: 李書帆 <leechu729@...il.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
shufan_lee(李書帆) <shufan_lee@...htek.com>,
cy_huang(黃啟原) <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Jun Li <jun.li@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: modify parameter of
tcpci_irq")
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 07:26:07PM +0800, 李書帆 wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> 2018-03-12 19:07 GMT+08:00 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:46:42PM +0800, ShuFan Lee wrote:
> >> From: ShuFan Lee <shufan_lee@...htek.com>
> >
> > Your subject is odd, that line should be below, in the signed-off-by:
> > area, not as the subject of the patch :(
> >
> > Can you fix this up and resend?
> Yes.
> If I understand correctly, the title should be like
> staging: typec: modify parameter of tcpci_irq
> and the "Fixes" tag should be put in the signed-off-by area.
Correct.
> Should it be in the beginning of the area:
> Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: handle vendor defined part and
> modify drp toggling flow")
> Signed-off-by: xxx
>
> or the end of the area?
> Signed-off-by: xxx
> Fixes: 8f9439022648("staging: typec: handle vendor defined part and
> modify drp toggling flow")
Either is acceptable, but usually you see the first example here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists