[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180313124128.875efd39a5d3ce9a9bb37e63@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:41:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com, npiggin@...il.com,
baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: OK to merge via powerpc? (was Re: [PATCH 05/14] mm: make
memblock_alloc_base_nid non-static)
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:06:35 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> Anyone object to us merging the following patch via the powerpc tree?
>
> Full series is here if anyone's interested:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=28377&state=*
>
Yup, please go ahead.
I assume the change to the memblock_alloc_range() declaration was an
unrelated, unchangelogged cleanup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists