lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180313124128.875efd39a5d3ce9a9bb37e63@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:41:28 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     mhocko@...e.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
        gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com, npiggin@...il.com,
        baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: OK to merge via powerpc? (was Re: [PATCH 05/14] mm: make
 memblock_alloc_base_nid non-static)

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:06:35 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:

> Anyone object to us merging the following patch via the powerpc tree?
> 
> Full series is here if anyone's interested:
>   http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=28377&state=*
> 

Yup, please go ahead.

I assume the change to the memblock_alloc_range() declaration was an
unrelated, unchangelogged cleanup.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ