[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180314105620.5d98ff9f@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:56:20 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, mhocko@...e.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, pasha.tatashin@...cle.com,
takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com,
baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: OK to merge via powerpc? (was Re: [PATCH 05/14] mm: make
memblock_alloc_base_nid non-static)
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:41:28 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:06:35 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Anyone object to us merging the following patch via the powerpc tree?
> >
> > Full series is here if anyone's interested:
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=28377&state=*
> >
>
> Yup, please go ahead.
>
> I assume the change to the memblock_alloc_range() declaration was an
> unrelated, unchangelogged cleanup.
>
It is. I'm trying to get better at that. Michael might drop that bit if
he's not already sick of fixing up my patches...
Thanks,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists